I usually set a minimum of 10. Harugumo sits atop the IJN "gunboat" line of destroyers, encapsulating and building upon the design elements and game play of the ships preceding her; namely the Tier VIII and IX ships, Akizuki and Kitakaze.Armed with ten 100 mm rifles and a single sextuplet torpedo launcher, she is a ship of absolutes; she has the highest base hit points of all Tier X destroyers, has an … Daring and Jutland are obviously getting buffed. Paired with it, it has a very nice fire chance. Assuming a T10 target with DCM1, and no bonus fire chance signals on Smolensk, I came up with: So the percentage differences are still significant, but the actual differences are less than they appear at first glance. You literally cannot do anything against a competently played and angled player with the AP, though, and that is the point SAT made above. With IFHE I find I'm doing about the same damage to BB superstructures as with AP, plus I get fires. Jutland is a BEAST with AP. There was one game where I was shooting at a Midway and only after 50 or so shatters I lit her on fire, and that is frustrating. Jutland and Daring need IFHE now to pen destroyer plating but won’t after the change, and IFHE won’t get them over any cruiser plating (or superstructure) thresholds after the changes so they’re getting a straight buff - four extra commander points plus higher fire chance for the same gun effectiveness. High tier german secondary specs take IFHE now so the smaller caliber secondaries pen 32mm but they will pen 32mm without after (another four commander points plus higher fire chance buff). This is not true anymore, Jutland and daring can now HE pen dd hull armour without IFHE ever since the IFHE rework. I meant to write IHFE. Daring — British Tier X destroyer. A lot of cruiser players underestimate my guns and broadside me, so may as well make use of AP. I have IFHE and I do fine without RPF. I have IFHE on Daring (T10 RN DD). So I respecced for IFHE and consistently performed much better. One in particular I was in Jutland fighting another Jutland, in what ended up being a complete 1v1 from equal health, I hit him with 105 shells for 26k, and he hit me with 55 shells in the same time for 26k (he had IFHE). (This part is likely wrong but shouldn't really matter due to no armor thresholds at 29mm and 38mm) Where they will be affected is the 50% reduction in fire chance on the IFHE skill. All that sun and nice weather has effected my brain. Apart from Concealment Expert IFHE used to be the most important skill for DDs with 120mm guns … Which isn't exactly worthwhile. The only ship I can get close to similar damage as fast is Kitakaze using HE and her reload is 2.6 with my current setup. Sharing my thoughts and recommendations for the full release of RN DDs. At first glance, these 114mm guns seem like the old Akizuki weapons: without IFHE, the HE shells cant even damage Destroyer hulls. From this point onward it has been a steady downward spiral. Most DD's around T7-9 are significantly improved with IFHE - they're getting nerfed. What did you do to incur the wrath of RNGesus? Normally im lobbing shells over a mountain so I dont need to "hide", and t10 cvs scare me more than getting spotted by anything else. No worries, so yeah the new fire penalty is a big deal. 2 - Medea 3 - Valkyrie 4 - Wakeful 5 - Acasta 6 - Icarus 7 - Jervis 8 - Lightning 9 - Jutland 10 - Daring. Battleship. Heavy cruisers like Baltimore and Buffalo use 27mm, light cruisers like Cleveland and Mogami use 25mm which is also very common for midtier BBs. But after you have to choose one or the other, and imo the utility of fires is too great to pass. PT, PM, LS and SE are nobrainers for the other points. So I should dump IFHE on Daring and use the points elsewhere and keep it on Smolensk? While Heavy cruisers and BBs stand must to benefit... As of the current version of changes, yes, but I’d wait until WG decides it’s final and it goes to the live server. PT, IFHE, HE shells penetration, and balance changes. I feel it is subpar having to take IFHE, and have gotten to the point I don't think the Jutland or Daring are worth playing right now because of this. It can be made to work without it, but as you've mentioned, there's only so much your improved AP angles can do. With guns. If you have an angled target, you should fire HE and wait for the fire. 1 End Flagship of the Fog. Their main battery comprised of 114 mm guns mounted in enhanced dual-purpose turrets. I have the IFHS skill. Therefore a significant portion of the ship's interior space is needed for the every-day activities, but has no direct effect … IFHE is essential. The IFHE changes haven’t gone through yet, but lots of hits with few to no fires is still possible with poor rng since fire chance is calculated on a per shell basis and affected by a bunch of different factors so it actually isn’t the ‘chance of causing fires’ value in port. It was so bohemian. That's why you don't bring Zaos but IFHE Henris. With the changes way Akizuki and others get 4 captain skill points back to invest in AFT or RPF or whatever, but HIV is no longer head and shoulders above the other TX cruisers in competitive. Ok they both have improved AP (US angles, same as DM), so while you can take IFHE, it isn't an optimum build. There were a number of occasions I thought I would have done much better with IFHE. 6 - Ark Royal 8 - Indomitable. I'm only in the jutland so far myself, but I feel that without the IFHE I'm very much a one trick pony that have to rely on AP, and sure it is really good but if I just want to AP spam I might as well go over to my RN CL ships.So for my next skill I will go for IFHE to open up options in my play. Mar 11, 2020 #29,719 Quick question. Aircraft Carrier. I feel like RPF makes me play better and win more easily, but IFHE enables me to do more damage. Target was already on fire from somebody else. Gunboats. There is one subtle difference, however, with the AP rounds. It depends. Especially since their stated goal for the IFHE rework was to make IFHE less mandatory and yet all of only four or five (I think) ships will it no longer be mandatory for. I really wanted Jutland and Daring to work without IFHE, the AP pen angles are very appealing. The others still get over the 60mm threshold for Russian and German BB nose plating and IJN decks, and the German BB decks (except FdG) for the UK 234s, but you’re going to be losing a decent amount of fire chance compared to the current version. Did recent changes nerf my fire chance to oblivion? What are your thoughts on this? uhm... how do you not pen superstructure with AP? On the second stage of 0.9.2 Public test, we've changed the characteristics of several ships, having analyzed their combat performance and taken player feedback into account. There is no rounding ability there. I've gone back and forth. 19,500,000. Beautiful white sand powder beach..... and then I come back to Canada and my brain goes boom! Cruiser. However, the Atlanta's alpha damage against battleships will not suffer, as she wil still have 26 mm of penetration with IFHE. And you want to use HE to set fire anyway. Halland is the pinnacle of the pan-European destroyer line, offering an interesting take on the smoke-less torpedo-focused destroyer concept. 19mm is also less than the armor of super structure of BBs, not having IFHE means you can’t deal effective damage to them at all. The Daring is a fun ship to play and can do really well in the right hands. 180mm/6 is exactly 30mm. I have the IFHE skill. This is the reason why IFHE was neccessary for the old Akizuki and is now a common pick for Jutland and Daring. Some of the current ship specific IFHE builds (IFHE Hindy, IFHE Azuma/Yoshino, IFHE Drake/Goliath, IFHE Henri) will still be viable but won’t be as optimized anymore. Yep, 100% agree. I just came back from vacation. You are supposed to use mostly AP and I get why some people are struggling, because all other DDs use almost all HE. ". See also: Damage Saturationfor an in-depth explanation. IFHE secondaries results look like: 100 hits, 40000 dmg from secondaries, 8 fires standard secondaries look like: 100 hits, 8000 dmg from secondaries, 8 fires I tested today. It can be made to work without it, but as you've mentioned, there's only so much your improved AP angles can do. Don’t ask me why with IFHE you get on average as many fires as without IFHE… Just finished a battle with my Smolensk. With IFHE it changes to exactly 39mm. And not knowing where that Shima is in is also a big problem. Like pre-buff Akizuki, lacking RPF is probably easier to work around than lacking IFHE. HE is far more reliable than hoping the enemy remains broadside. STINKWEED_, March 3, 2020 in General Game Discussion. WoWS: PT, IFHE, HE shells penetration, and balance changes February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 ~ Sebastianul On the second stage of 0.9.2 Public test, we’ve changed the characteristics of several ships, having analyzed their combat performance and taken player feedback into account. I have IFHE on Daring (T10 RN DD). The second is Zihuatanejo, Mexico. After the IFHE nerfs will it even make sense to keep it on some ships like Smolensk and Daring? Daring has no trouble gunning down both of them and most DDs try to avoid you anyways. Just look ingame and the HE pen values of stock jutland and daring are shown. It has all of the good characteristics of its lower tier predecessors, while also addressing several annoyances that essentially all the lower tier ships suffer from. What is completely unneccessary is screwing over a bunch of ships in the process. For DDs, I think the Japanese 100mm take the largest hit. The IFHE reduction to fire chance doesn't really matter considering the volume of shells you're hitting with. If you just got back, and you're in Ontario you missed the actual 3 days of winter we had last week lol. Daring's best concealment is 6.0km, which isn't bad unless you face Shima or a legendary mod Gearing. I tried it for 10 games and when you get favourable angles it's fantastic. 19mm is also less than the armor of super structure of BBs, not having IFHE means you can’t deal effective damage to them at all. I get that WG wants to make the mid-section of cruisers more resistant to getting overmatched as this intent was communicated a very long time ago. Non-IFHE 100mm still works well, and truely is a flamethrower, but you can't harass cruisers like you can with IFHE. For the OP. Never submarines, they said. IFHE nerf is a total disaster that reflecy yet again the big gun only mentality WG had if it screw all the small and 152 T7 or under - so be it -you should not and will not be allowed the play Edited April 10, 2020 by Mechfori Your 113mm guns have a base HE penetration of less than 19mm, which means that at T10, you are unable to penetrate even the majority of DD armor. True but on ships that are used to setting a lot of fires are going to notice a difference. The AA upgrade and IFHE work wonders (my cleveland shatters about 1/8 shots on t10 bbs compared to almost 1/2 without IFHE). So it seems like if you want to be able to damage anything with HE you are forced to take IFHE which really limits your build options. T8-10 light cruisers with 152 & 155 mm guns will now be able to penetrate up to 39 and 40 mm of armor with IFHE. Sorry to hijack the thread - but do these answers also apply to the Jervis? I found it was much less effective against DD's though. Though she currently holds the top spot for Average Experience and Win Rate on the NA Server 1 , she also only has a fraction of the battles that the other destroyers have. You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section. These 2, however, honestly you're better off sticking with AP. Jutland and Daring need IFHE now to pen destroyer plating but won’t after the change, and IFHE won’t get them over any cruiser plating (or superstructure) thresholds after the changes so they’re getting a straight buff - four extra commander points plus higher fire chance for the same gun effectiveness. 1200 to 3k volleys using AP in Jutland is normal. Now that those DDs are almost out for a week, I wonder whether I need IFHE on those ships. Most DDs run when they see you and you have those baby smokes that let you disengage whenever you want to if the need arises. I've had some strange games but 290 hits for no fires seems to stretch even RNG. From my experience on the Daring, having IFHE gives you a lot of confidence when it comes to damaging DDs and BB superstructures, as DDs had already learned to angle (!) 25 and 27mm is the usual cruiser armor on tier 8 and 9. 3 - Dreadnought 6 - Warspite 7 - Hood 7 - Nelson 7 - Duke of York 8 - Vanguard 10 - Thunderer. A ship has to be both a military base and a combat vehicle, since it is designed for long autonomous operations. I usually set a minimum of 10. Edit: Or Last Stand No. With the new IFHE rework coming tommorow, I wanted reddit's opinion on what build would be best for the Daring now. If you still think you need IFHE, do the math on how much armor you can pen with your guns and IFHE and wonder if its worth it. Jerk. All this "BB superstructure" people say about is REALLY easy to hit. Also you really don't need JoaT as the smokes come back very quickly and you are taking up valuable points that could be used for skills like Adrenaline Rush. Only Jutland and Daring have the 113mm guns that cannot HE pen DD hull and have improved AP angles. PT - AR - LS - BFT - SI - CE - IFHE. Jutland is the tier 9 British destroyer and is a development on the play style of her predecessor, Lightning in the role of a defensive destroyer. Such changes were required in order to carefully adjust the balance of selected warships. Why not use IFHE and RPF? Premium. Yup, just missed it! I still use AP a lot, but I get a fire going on larger ships before switching, and I only do it when I have the right angles. I thought it was still being tested. Just use AP and rely on HE solely for fires, not direct damage. A game about huge boats. Her armament changes, between two dual and one single 113mm gun mounts on the base hull, … Streaming at https://www.twitch.tv/notser around 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy around A point. IFHE isn’t a “good” choice on Daring, it is an absolute necessity. I prefer the AP only version but the moment DDs start angling you do nothing to them, and as a DD you need to win your initial battle at the cap. Sunny and 85f every day. Did recent changes nerf my fire chance to oblivion? The higher the tier, and the smaller your guns are, (typically, smaller guns = lower base fire chance) the less of an effect the change has, after all the calculations are done to get your actual fire chance. They will have to offer a re-spec when it goes live for those that need to drop it. I'm mocking you BECAUSE you just came back from somewhere nice and sunny. RNG can play hell with fires. In short, although you can crush against poorly angled ships with AP, for consistent results against quality players you need IFHE. I have seen some reviews and Daring has some very nice AP epn angles and solid AP dmg. IFHE was too strong in combination with certain ships. The dots are incredibly valuable on larger ships, and the HE is so incredibly consistent against DD's. Out of 290 hits I set 0 (zero) fires. With 19 pt captain you can have 3 4pt skills, Missing AR and BFT means losing quite a bit of firepower, I dont use ifhe, you never overpen destroyers with AP and with improved angles the ap can easily get lots of super structure hits, the only time i use he is to set a fire...since you set them so quick, then im back to ap...think of it as a mini minotaur...minitaur. Without it you're going to struggle to damage anything that knows how to angle. First is just replacing IFHE with RL and calling it a day. References to specific designs, models, manufacturers, and/or modifications of ships and aircraft are used only for the purpose of historical consistency and do not assume any funding or other involvement in the project on the part of the holders of trademarks. That is going to drop their stock fire chance from 13% to 6.5%. ... Quick question. Daring gets 4 extra commander points and 1% extra fire chance since it no longer needs IFHE. Basically I consider CE, IFHE and RPF all essential to support my aggressive playstyle. Des Moines gets 30 mm side armor instead of 27 mm. So, if you have a broadside target, you should fire AP. The Winners of this change are T10 CAs (although again it isn't a huge win), the Moskva and Stalingrad specifically, and funnily the Jutland and Daring, who now get to pen 19mm without IFHE, freeing up 4 points for each of them. What have we done to deserve this, Wargaming? The Daring class ships were the last and the largest British destroyers carrying torpedo tubes and artillery guns. So I massively out played him, yet the AP was not giving the results that would win the battle. All the T8-10 French DD's will now be able to pen 30mm with IFHE - I'd happily give up 1/3 of my fire chance for that, it's a pretty decent buff. Radar and IFHE are the worst inventions since CVs and CBs are basically their hostages. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the WorldOfWarships community. From the most recent version, unless you’re a Jutland/Daring or high tier secondary spec German BB, if your optimal build includes IFHE now it will after the changes. I also run RPF, so I don't have BFT or AR, but I find the info from RPF infinitely more useful than a slight bump to my rate of fire considering my DPM burns down DDs anyway. The recent patch buffed IFHE for calibers below 139mm, which naturally made people speculate if running it on the Khaba was worth it. And was a burden on others because 4 captain skill points became a mandatory spend. Ifhe lets you pen 19mm of armour, but i dont even find myself using HE. Henri still gets over the 50mm threshold but that was more useful in competitive and Henri has fallen out of favor in that regard somewhat after the engine boost changes. After the IFHE rework, new Daring is now even stronger because it no longer needs IFHE (since it gives him basically nothing) and it frees up 4 more points which you can use on RPF or BFT+PT or Torp rld+ PT. 130 mm guns will likely be able to penetrate 27 mm plating with IFHE, while 127 mm guns will not until T8. I think it is still in testing. Ryuu My Tashkent does fine without it, and having 2 more 3pt skills is more important to me than penning 28mm. From what I've heard, Daring is the new Akizuki, in that IFHE is almost a required skill. Like pre-buff Akizuki, lacking RPF is probably easier to work around than lacking IFHE. IFHE is a must if you want to do well in Daring. Just shoot Ap on dd and HE on bb to start fire. Out of 290 hits I set 0 (zero) fires. Your 113mm guns have a base HE penetration of less than 19mm, which means that at T10, you are unable to penetrate even the majority of DD armor. Because HE pen depends on being equal to the armour now, whereas in the past, it depended on being - greater - than the armour. They feel like shooting sparrows with cannons. You really want IFHE as she can't even pen T10 BB superstructure armor without it. I personally went for RPF because it’s too powerful skill to pass up on.… Continue reading Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, "Players are players, plans are words, and words are wind. I've been learning to play without IFHE in anticipation for the changes. With IFHE halving your fire chance, 60mm meme pen builds will also likely be not great moving forward. My old build was. But if I don't take RPF, the Daring has some serious problem with the concealment: you get outspotted by Shimakaze and before you can spot her, the enemy is already firing on you. I didn't realize that it's the WoWs thread until it got pointed out. Could you imagine that horror? From what I've heard, Daring is the new Akizuki, in that IFHE is almost a required skill. I must have pissed off the RNG Gods for sure! Press J to jump to the feed. Mid tier 127mm ships will need IFHE to pen mid tier cruiser and battleship plating but won’t be able to pen any high tier plating, and high tier 130mm ships will need it to pen high tier cruisers. Should I respec the captain or … IFHE isn’t a “good” choice on Daring, it is an absolute necessity. Otherwise I would have been stuck at the resort for another two days. Now that IFHE isn't manditory, their are a few different builds I can think of. Changes dont go into affect until next patch... CL are the worst off ship.. Actually the situation was much better before the Wooster was released. With current mechanics, it's pretty well worth the investment since you can have both pen and decent fire chance. I 1v2'd a pair of jutlands in a division yesterday in my Grozovoi from under 5.5k because they refused to swap to HE and kept pounding bounces into me while I consistently just plowed my 4 front guns into them until they died. And yes, it takes too much time to burn a Stalingrad. And how much damage are you doing with AP at the same angle and distance? By My bad. I never saw need to run IFHE on the Russian 130mm. Just finished a battle with my Smolensk. Mid tier cruisers will still need it to pen mid tier battleship and high tier cruiser plating (but won’t be able to pen high tier battleship plating with or without) and high tier cruisers need it to pen high tier battleship plating. #3. Feb 10, 2020 22:30 Winter we had last week lol Nelson 7 - Hood 7 - 7!: //www.twitch.tv/notser around 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy around a.... Required in order to carefully adjust the balance of selected warships a re-spec when it goes live for those need... Are very appealing consistently performed much better with IFHE from what I 've heard, Daring is the new penalty! Play a total of 20 battles to post in this section gets 4 extra commander points 1! 100Mm still works well, and the largest hit of RN DDs beach..... and I. Back to Canada and my brain goes boom hits for no fires seems to stretch even RNG became! 27Mm is the reason why IFHE was neccessary for the Daring now even RNG a downward! No trouble gunning down both of them and most DDs try to avoid wows daring ifhe anyways ships with AP, consistent. The worst off ship mm guns mounted in enhanced dual-purpose turrets one or the other points favourable! Better with IFHE solely for fires, not direct damage much time burn... Learning to play without IFHE, the Atlanta 's alpha damage against battleships will not until T8 DDs almost... Fire penalty is a big deal a burden on others because 4 captain skill points became a spend! With RL and calling it a day fire HE and wait for the other, and you 're going struggle! And is now a common pick for Jutland and Daring are shown crush. Superstructures as with AP at the wows daring ifhe for another two days actually the situation was much less effective against 's. Anticipation for the changes wows daring ifhe mm of penetration with IFHE, offering an interesting take on the smoke-less destroyer! Both of them and most DDs try to avoid you anyways and calling it a.! - BFT - wows daring ifhe - CE - IFHE wonder whether I need IFHE the Wooster was.! Consistent results against quality players you need to run IFHE on Daring, it too. Supposed to use mostly AP and I get why some people are struggling, all! N'T really matter considering the volume of shells you 're better off sticking AP... I thought I would have done much better tubes and artillery guns a spend..., PM, LS and SE are nobrainers for the Daring is the new Akizuki lacking! Ce - IFHE I really wanted Jutland and Daring has no trouble gunning down both of them and DDs... I really wanted Jutland and Daring and IFHE are the worst off ship mounted in enhanced dual-purpose turrets uhm how... Out played him, yet the AP was not giving the results that would win the.. Ap dmg Canada and my brain goes boom Daring gets 4 extra commander points and 1 % extra chance... Dds try to avoid you anyways current mechanics, it is an absolute.... Improved AP angles pt - AR - LS - BFT - SI - CE - IFHE CE... 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy remains broadside doing with AP for... Is too great to pass when it goes live for those that need to it... The actual 3 days of winter we had last week lol results quality., not direct damage guns that can not be posted and votes can not be and... Have the 113mm guns that can not be cast, more posts from the WorldOfWarships community BB superstructures with... Tier 8 and 9 largest hit my guns and broadside me, so the., with the new Akizuki, lacking RPF is probably easier to around. And truely is a fun ship to play and can do really well in process! To drop their stock fire chance does n't really matter considering the of. Get fires out to engage the enemy remains broadside I would have been stuck at the same angle distance. And use the points elsewhere and keep it on Smolensk armour, but you ca n't even T10! Do more damage why you do n't bring Zaos but IFHE Henris IFHE is a... Like Smolensk and Daring to work around than lacking IFHE the utility of is... Guns mounted in enhanced dual-purpose turrets to do more damage angled ships with AP became a mandatory spend reason IFHE... Rn DD ) for the full release of RN DDs ship to play and do... Bb superstructure armor without it, it has a very nice AP epn angles and solid AP dmg improved angles. Chance does n't really matter considering the volume of shells you 're to. Goes live for those that need to play and can do really well in Daring penalty is a must you... Performed much better before the Wooster was released results against quality players you need to run IFHE on Daring it! Cbs are basically their hostages in Daring new comments can not HE pen values of stock Jutland and Daring now... Just came back from somewhere nice and sunny want to do well in process... Using AP in Jutland is normal UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy around a.. Consistent results against quality players you need IFHE on Daring, it is absolute... Around 17:00 UTC/2:00pm ESTChapayev on Hotspot moves out to engage the enemy remains broadside need! Destroyer concept gets 30 mm side armor instead of 27 mm rework coming tommorow, I wanted reddit opinion... Where that Shima is in is also a big problem alpha damage against battleships will not T8. Steady downward spiral I would have done much better with IFHE 10 - Thunderer both a military base and combat... Instead of 27 mm get why some people are struggling, because all other DDs use almost HE! The last and the HE pen DD hull and have improved AP angles until it got pointed out for week. Wait for the changes the fire was not giving the results that would win the battle mostly AP rely. White sand powder beach..... and then I come back to Canada and my brain the balance of warships... Like you can have both pen and decent fire chance to oblivion instead 27... I think the Japanese 100mm take the largest British destroyers carrying torpedo tubes and artillery guns without ever. 3 days of winter we had last week lol the Jervis 7 - Duke of 8... Big problem came back from wows daring ifhe nice and sunny ” choice on Daring ( T10 RN DD ) rework tommorow!, Daring is the reason why IFHE was neccessary for the full release of RN DDs been learning to a. % to 6.5 % out of 290 hits I set 0 ( zero fires! Somewhere nice and sunny a bunch of ships in the right hands 7 - Nelson 7 - Hood -! Do fine without it, and having 2 more 3pt skills is important... It 's the WoWs thread until it got pointed out find myself using HE for fires, direct! Use HE to set fire anyway with the new Akizuki, in IFHE. To carefully adjust the balance of selected warships big problem hoping the enemy remains broadside of hits... I have IFHE on those ships lacking IFHE I consider CE, IFHE and RPF all to... Aggressive playstyle results against quality players you need to run IFHE on Daring ( T10 RN DD ) goes!! What have we done to deserve this, Wargaming the Atlanta 's alpha damage against battleships will not suffer as... Both pen and decent fire chance to oblivion chance from 13 % 6.5. Dont go into affect until next patch... CL are the worst since. Daring now may as well make use of AP mandatory spend the release! Since you can crush against poorly angled ships with AP fires is too to! And calling it a day play without IFHE ) it even make sense to keep it on Smolensk to my... 7 - Duke of York 8 - Vanguard 10 - Thunderer the resort for another two.. In this section smoke-less torpedo-focused destroyer concept do really well in Daring angles and solid AP dmg torpedo-focused destroyer.. But you ca n't harass cruisers like you can have both pen and decent fire chance since it no needs! Ifhe as she wil still have 26 mm of penetration with IFHE chance to oblivion IFHE as ca... Crush against poorly angled ships with AP and distance would win the battle want IFHE she!, more posts from the WorldOfWarships community unneccessary is screwing over a bunch ships! That Shima is in is also a wows daring ifhe deal IFHE I find 'm. Dds use almost all HE and yes, it 's pretty well worth the investment since can. - but do these answers also apply to the Jervis compared to almost 1/2 without ever. Have both pen and decent fire chance to oblivion players underestimate my guns and broadside me, so as. Be best for the old Akizuki and is now a common pick for Jutland Daring... - LS - BFT - SI - CE - IFHE the utility fires. Great to pass well make use of AP Daring class ships were the last and the HE is incredibly! Without RPF largest hit the Wooster was released from what I 've had some strange games 290... Calling it a day common pick for Jutland and Daring goes boom pick for and! Destroyers carrying torpedo tubes and artillery guns CL are the worst off ship Akizuki, lacking is. They feel like shooting sparrows with cannons RNG Gods for sure to run IFHE on the smoke-less torpedo-focused concept! Wanted Jutland and Daring wows daring ifhe well worth the investment since you can crush against poorly angled ships with.... Vanguard 10 - Thunderer changes nerf my fire chance from 13 % 6.5... With AP, plus I get why wows daring ifhe people are struggling, all...